🔗 Share this article

At present, an engaging cultural comfort pick is a show set in the past illustrating Manhattan's elite during a prosperous era. A particular plot briefly touches on industrial employees going on strike for what they call “888”: eight hours for work, sleep, and leisure.

This idea was not groundbreaking in the 1880s. The phrase, coined by activist Robert Owen, dates back to 1817. Before that, a centuries-old law capped workers in the New World to eight-hour days.

What might reformers like a Spanish monarch make of “996”? This phrase means working from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week – amounting to 72 hours of grind. Originating in the tech sector in China, 996 was once described as a “blessing” by an influential business leader. But, Chinese workers disagreed, mobilizing online and prevailing in court cases with companies.

Now, 996 is resurfacing – although it never went away. Reports indicate that employees in different fields are expected to put in long shifts. Within tech hubs, following such hours is viewed as a way to get ahead. Employment ads sometimes state absurdly long hours and indicate that applicants need to be thrilled about the prospect. Hiring managers are told that a willingness to endure such hours is mandatory.

One publication announced that overwork ethos is back and grindier than ever. A business owner summarized the mindset as: “No drinking, no drugs, 996, lift heavy, run far, marry early, track sleep, eat steak and eggs.” Another wrote online about often being on Saturdays and Sundays and producing top results late into the night.

A lot of individuals find it confusing with this development. Hadn't we all fallen out of love with overwork? Recent successes from four-day week initiatives show that nearly all trial members opted to keep the alternative arrangement. Observing global examples, balanced approaches to work that harmonize family, community, life and work do not necessarily come at a productivity cost and often lead to improved well-being.

Take the case of the Netherlands, with an average workweek is around 32 hours. Despite this, this state is doing better than other economies and stands fifth in the latest global well-being index.

Furthermore, reports indicate of increasing disinterest in overwork, especially among younger generations. Polls from leading companies revealed that life outside work emerged as the most important factor when picking a job. For the first time, this element came ahead of compensation as a motivator.

How then are we seeing fresh, extreme push for excessive labor? Some hypotheses may clarify this trend. Initially, it could be the last gasp of a fading philosophy – one last push prior to its end. Another view proposes recent research showing that overwork leads to mental alterations. Evidence conclude that overworked individuals exhibit notable differences in neural pathways related to executive function and mood management. Looking at some prominent tech leaders, such a conclusion seems plausible. Perhaps only those with cognitive differences could believe that such a schedule are beneficial or efficient.

Because innovators often love novelty, it's possible their tired brains could be convinced that grueling hours are old hat with bold new models. Which ideas could work? Many desire three-day weeks, which is close to a scholar's idealized 15-hour workweek. Different ideas include a specific ratio of work to rest, or spending a short time onsite and more time in leisure. Perhaps branded cleverly and rumors that it boosts longevity, any of these could be the latest craze in high-pressure sectors.